SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 487

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Manju Devi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Naresh Khatri, Advocate, Mool Singh Bhati, Advocate, Sheetal Kumbhat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The application for early listing of the case is allowed for reasons stated therein and the matter is taken up today itself.

2. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.c. has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.65/2020 registered at Police Station Jaswantpura, District Jalore and all consequential proceedings for offence under Sections 447, 166, 166-A, 120B IPC and Sections 3(1)(f), 3(1)(g), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that respondent No.2-complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the matter. Counsel has placed reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., (2012) 10 SCC 303. In these circumstances, the impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise.

4. Counsel for the respondents No.2-complainant appearing concurs the fact of compromise and submits that in view of the compromise, the respondents No.2-complainant does not want to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top