SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 425

SANDEEP MEHTA
Vijay Kulriya – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.S. Choudhary, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellants, who are in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.129/2020 registered at the Police Station Rajiyasar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 308, 382, 341, 323, 325, 427, 147, 149 IPC and Section 3(2)(V)(Va) of the SC/ST Act, against the order dated 05.02.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Misc. Case No.49/2021, whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellants was rejected.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record the proof of service of notice upon the respondent-complainant, but no one has appeared to oppose the appeal on his behalf. As per the Parcha Bayan of the complainant Het Ram recorded by a police officer of the Police Station Rajiyasar at the CHC, Suratgarh, omnibus allegations of assault and beating by blunt weapons are attributed to the appellants herein, Kaluram, A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top