SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 420

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Hasina – Appellant
Versus
Shri Naresh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sandeep Saruparia, for the Appellant; Mr. S.R. Paliwal, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 29.11.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajsamand in Claim Case No.32/2000, whereby the learned Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.7,08,200/- as compensation to the appellants-claimants on account of the death of Hussain Bohra in the accident which occurred on 30.09.1999.

2. The learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence and after hearing the counsel for the parties, decided the claim petition of the appellants.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the findings of the Tribunal on issue No.3 and 5 are incorrect on account of the fact that the deceased was a businessman and he had filed his income tax returns time to time. He submits that the income tax returns for the assessment year 1996-97 shows the income of the deceased as Rs.60,000/-, for the assessment year 1997-98 as Rs.70,750/-, for the assessment year 1998-99 as Rs.84,765/- and for the assessment year 1999-00, the income of the deceased shows as Rs. 1,05,782/-. The income tax returns were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top