JUDGMENT

1. In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

2. The petitioner-defendant has preferred this writ petition claiming the following relief:

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with costs and by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned order dated 08.03.2019 (Ann. 15) passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No. 2, Bhilwara in civil suit No.120/2014 (Satyanarayan & Ors. Vs. Madhav Lal & Ors.) may kindly be reversed and the document i.e. agreement dated 15.12.2009 may be ordered to be taken on record and may be allowed to be exhibited."

3. This Hon'ble Court had passed the following order in Punamchand Jeengar Vs. Satyanarayan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4213/2017 decided on 27.11.2017):

"The petitioner has laid challenge to an order dated 21.01.2017 whereby his application dated 02.09.2016 filed under Order VIII Rule 1 A (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected by the Trial Court, while observating as under: -

Mr. Rakesh Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner narrating the facts of the case stated that a categoric reference of