SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 564

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Harshita - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 7473 of 2020, 5868 of 2020, 5984 of 2020, 6607 of 2020, 6611 of 2020, 6613 of 2020, 6632 of 2020, 6688 of 2020
Decided on : 15-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Kunal Bishnoi, Advocate, Hapu Ram Bishnoi, Advocate, Rajendra Katariya, Advocate, Gaurav Thanvi, Advocate, Avinash Acharya, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of reservation to Other Backward Classes (OBC) candidates in Central Educational Institutions, as provided under the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006, and the importance of not disturbing the admissions of OBC candidates who had already been admitted to the school.

Headnote:

Reservation - School Admissions - Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Section 3 - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court: The court discussed the provisions of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006, specifically Section 3, which provides for reservation of seats in Central Educational Institutions for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes. The court also referred to judgments of other High Courts and the Supreme Court related to similar issues. The court highlighted the legal provisions regarding reservation for OBC candidates and their applicability to the case, and how the notice dated 31.03.2020 introducing reservation for OBC Category after the issuance of the prospectus was unsustainable. The court also emphasized the importance of not disturbing the admissions of OBC candidates who had already been admitted to the school.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the cancellation of their school admissions on the ground that their caste(s) did not find mention in the list of backward classes issued by the Central Government. The petitioner, belonging to the Vishnoi Community, was given admission under the Rural Backward Class quota for a school in Jaisalmer, but her admission was later cancelled due to the non-availability of an OBC Certificate issued by the Central Government.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the notice dated 31.03.2020 introducing reservation for OBC Category after the issuance of the prospectus was unsustainable. The court also held that the definition of 'Other Backward Classes' under Section 2(g) of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006, meant the class or classes determined by the Central Government, and therefore, the reservation to OBC was applicable regardless of the notice dated 31.03.2020. The court also emphasized the importance of not disturbing the admissions of OBC candidates who had already been admitted to the school.

Issues: The issues involved in the case included the legality of the notice dated 31.03.2020 introducing reservation for OBC Category after the issuance of the prospectus, the applicability of reservation to OBC candidates, and the cancellation of admissions of OBC candidates who had already been admitted to the school.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the notice dated 31.03.2020 introducing reservation for OBC Category after the issuance of the prospectus was unsustainable. The court also emphasized the importance of not disturbing the admissions of OBC candidates who had already been admitted to the school.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to keep petitioners' admissions as OBC Candidates intact as exceptional cases and allowed the petitioners to continue their studies till they complete their education or voluntarily leave the school.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Mehta, J. - The present group of writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners, inter alia, challenging action of cancellation of their school admissions on the ground that their caste(s) do not find mention in the list of backward classes issued by the Central Government.

2. As all the writ petitions involve common facts and questions of law, they are being disposed of conjointly. However, for the purpose of narration, facts of SBCWP No.7473/2020, Harshita Vs. Union of India, are being taken into consideration.

3. Before adverting to the casespecific facts, it will be apt to adumbrate the features of the schools in question:-

    3.1 The Government of India introduced Jawahar Navodaya Vidhyalayas (for short, 'the JNVs') with a view to augment education in line with the National Education Policy, 1986. According to the prospectus issued by the respondents, there are 661 sanctioned Navodaya Vidhyalayas (out of which 636 are functional) spread in 28 States and 7 Union Territories.

3.2 The JNVs are co-educational residential schools fully aided and controlled by the Union of India through an autonomous organization, called 'Navodaya Vidhyalaya Samiti'.

3.3 Admissions to JNVs are given through admission test conducted by Central Board of Secondary Education, held annually on All India basis at block and district level.

3.4 These schools, which are from 6th Standard to 12th Standard, are established with an objective of excellence coupled with equity and social justice and to promote good quality modern education including strong component of culture, inculcation of values, awareness of environment, adventurous activities and physical education.

3.5 The scheme gives priority to rural students and with that object in mind, it provides that at least 75% seats would be filled by rural children, with a further stipulation that 1/3rd of total seats will be for girl students. The scheme also provides reservation.

3.6 As per prospectus issued for Admission Test, 2020, following types of reservation were envisaged:-

"Reservation of Seats.-

(a) At least 75% of the seats in a district are filled by candidates selected from rural areas and remaining seats are filled from urban areas of the district.

(b) Reservation of seats in favour of children belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is provided in proportion to their population in the district concerned provided that in no district, such reservation will be less than the national average (15% for SC and 7.5% for ST) but subject to maximum of 50% for both the categories (SC & ST) taken together. These reservations are interchangeable and over and above the candidates selected under open merit.

(c) Minimum One third of the total seats are filled by girls.

(d) There is a provision for reservation for Divyang children (i.e. Orthopedically Handicapped, Hearing Impaired and Visually Handicapped) as per GOI norms.

'Blindness' refers to a condition where a person suffers from any of the following namely:

(i) total absence of sight; or

(ii) Visual acuity not exceeding 6/60 or 20/200 (snellen) in the better eye with correcting lenses; or

(iii) Limitation of the field of vision subtending an angle of 20 degree or worse.

'Hearing Impairment' means loss of sixty decibels or more in the better ear in the conversational range of frequencies.

'Locomotor disability' means disability of the bones joints or muscles leading to substantial restriction of the movement of the limbs or any form of cerebral palsy.

'Person with disability' means a person suffering from not less than forty percent of any disability as certified by a medical authority."

4. For admission in Class VI for academic year 2020-21, the candidates of State of Rajasthan were required to fill-in their application forms by 15.09.2019, for the admission tests that were scheduled on 11.01.2020.

5. The petitioner, being aspirant of getting admission in Jawahar Navodaya Vidhyalaya, Jaisalmer, submitted her application form vide Registration No.

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top