SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 557

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Sandeep Mehta,Devendra Kachhawaha, JJ.
Narendra Kumar @ Kallu - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 862 of 2011
Decided on : 16-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Rajendra Soni, Advocate, Anil Joshi, Advocate

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - [SECTION] 302/120B I.P.C. - [ACT] SC/ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT - [SUBJECT] CONVICTION FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS - [KEYWORD] FACT OF THE CASE, FINDING OF THE COURT, ISSUES, RATIO DECIDENDI, FINAL DECISION

Fact of the Case:

The instant appeal has been preferred by the accused appellants being aggrieved of the judgment dated 14.9.2011 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Sriganganagar in Sessions Case No.53/2007 by which, they were convicted and sentenced as below:-Conviction for Offences under SectionsSentences 302/120B I.P.C. Life imprisonment with fine of Rs.5000/- each in default 6 months SI 364/120B I.P.C. 10 years R.I. with fine of Rs.2000/- each in default, 4 months S.I. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

Finding of the Court:

We find that evidence of the witness regarding the steps of investigation is convincing and untainted. He had no cause to fabricate evidence for implicating the accused persons.

Issues: None

Ratio Decidendi: None

Final Decision: Accordingly, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed as being devoid of merit.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - Reportable

The instant appeal has been preferred by the accused appellants being aggrieved of the judgment dated 14.9.2011 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Sriganganagar in Sessions Case No.53/2007 by which, they were convicted and sentenced as below:-

Conviction for Offences under Sections

Sentences

302/120B I.P.C.

Life imprisonment with fine of Rs.5000/- each in default 6 months SI

364/120B I.P.C.

10 years R.I. with fine of Rs.2000/- each in default, 4 months S.I.

Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Facts relevant and germane for disposal of the appeal are noted hereinbelow:

The complainant Babulal Paswan lodged a complaint (Ex.P11) in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sriganganagar on 22.6.2006 stating inter-alia that he was an auto-rickshaw driver and that his wife Smt.Tara Devi used to do domestic chores in various households for sustaining the family. They had five children out of which, three were living in their village and other two, namely Ajay and minor daughter Sunita, were living with them in Ganganagar. On 14.6.2006, as usual, Sunita left his house in the morning to carry out the domestic chores in other households at Ganganagar, but she did not return till 10 11 A.M. upon which, the complainant got worried and searched for her till evening. On making enquiry in the neighbourhood, he received information that Sunita had been seen with one Bhomli, her husband and 2-3 other people near the house, where the complainant used to reside earlier. He informed the concerned police station about his missing daughter the very following day, but no action was taken on his grievance and thus, he was compelled to lodge the complaint in the Court. He prayed that his daughter should be traced out. The complaint was forwarded to the Mahila Police Station Sriganganagar under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for investigation where, F.I.R. No.55/2006 (Ex.P12) came to be registered for the offences under Sections 363 & 366A I.P.C. The investigation was assigned to Sub-Inspector Raghuveer Singh P.W.26, who recorded statements of the complainant Babulal, his wife Smt.Tara etc. Photograph of Sunita was collected and was attached to the file (Ex.P17). During investigation, the finger of suspicion pointed towards one Deepak Kumar @ Ashwani S/o Kedar Prasad resident of Gangrohi Bazar, District Maharajgunj, Uttar Pradesh. Fervent efforts were made to search him and the missing girl but the same proved futile. Accordingly, a negative Final Report with the conclusion that the missing girl could not be traced out was submitted in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sriganganagar. From where, the file was returned to the Investigating Officer for further investigation. It may be stated here that in the intervening period i.e. on 16.1.2007, the dead body of an unidentified female with marked signs of violence was recovered in the jurisdiction of Police Station Rajpura, Punjab. The Investigating Officer of the present case suspected that the girl found murdered in Punjab could be Sunita, daughter of the complainant Babu Lal. Accordingly, file of inquiry proceedings (Ex.P38) under Section 174 Cr.P.C. No.26/2007 drawn up at the Police Station Rajpura, Patiala including the post-mortem report and the photographs etc was collected. These documents were attached to the file of the case at hand. Babu Lal and his wife identified the photographs (Ex.P6 and Ex.P7) to be of their daughter Sunita and on the basis of their statements, the Investigating Officer concluded that the unknown female deceased found in Rajpura, Punjab was the missing girl Sunita. As per the caste certificate, Sunita belonged to the Scheduled Caste category and thus, the offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was added to the case and accordingly investigation was assigned to Kesarichand Jandu (P.W.22) Dy.S.P. SC/ST Cell, Sriganganagar, who conducted further investi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top