SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 602

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Heena – Appellant
Versus
Bhana Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sunil Purohit, Advocate, V.K. Vyas, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present appeal for enhancement of compensation amount has been preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and Award dated 23.08.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhinmal in M.A.C. Case No. 46/2003 whereby, an amount of Rs. 98,800/- was awarded as compensation in favour of the appellants on account of death of Smt. Chouthi in the accident which occurred on 04.11.2002.

2. A claim petition was filed by the appellants before the Tribunal claiming compensation under various heads on account of death of Smt. Chouthi in the accident which took place on 04.11.2002.

3. Learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence on record and hearing the counsel for the parties, decided the claim petition of the appellants awarding the compensation to the tune of Rs. 98,800/- under various heads in favour of the appellants/claimants.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the Tribunal while deciding the claim-petition of the appellants awarded a meager sum as compensation in their favour. He further submits that the findings of the Tribunal on issue No. 2 are erroneous as the notional income of the deceased was asses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top