SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 588

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Kumari Rekha – Appellant
Versus
Dhala Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ayush Gehlot for Mr. Rajesh Panwar, for the Appellant; Mr. L.D.Khatri, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present appeals are being heard and decided by this common judgment as they arise out of the same accident and common judgment passed by the Tribunal.

2. The above appeals have been preferred against the judgment and award dated 26.06.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pali in Motor Accident Claim Cases Nos.400/2001 (125/1999) and 368/2001 (92/1999) whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.26,707/- and Rs.84,009/-respectively as compensation in favour of the appellants-claimants with an interest @ 9% p.a. on account of the injuries suffered by them in the accident which occurred on 06.03.1999.

3. Learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence available on record and hearing learned counsel for the parties allowed the claim petitions of the appellants vide its judgment and award dated 26.06.2002 and awarded a sum of Rs.26,707/- and Rs.84,009/- respectively as compensation to the appellants.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the Tribunal has not correctly appreci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top