PANKAJ BHANDARI
Ghanshyam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pankaj Bhandari, J. - Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
2. F.I.R. No.476/2020 was registered at Police Station, Kotputli, District Jaipur for offence under Sections 354 I.P.C.
3. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioners that prior to lodging of the present F.I.R., a complaint was filed to the police that complainant-party intended to level false allegations against the petitioners. Parties were bound down under Section 107 & 116(3) of Cr.P.C.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor contends that notice under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C. has been given to the petitioners. They are co- operating with the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required.
5. I have considered the contentions.
6. Considering the contention put forth by counsel for the petitioners, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.
7. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Kotputli District Jaipur in F.I.R. No. 476/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.