SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 543

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Irfaan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Chandi Charan Ratnu, Advocate, Sher Singh Mahla, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhandari, J. - Petitioner has filed this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.536/2019 was registered at Police Station Sadar Hindon Dist. Karauli for offence under Sections 354(A) & 354(B) I.P.C. and Sections 7, 8, 11, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 67b of I.T. Act.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that prosecutrix is changing her statement. Statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has infirmity with the statement recorded before the Court. It is also contended that in the statement recorded before the Court, prosecutrix has alleged that she was raped on two occasions, this fact is not raised in the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. It is further contended that co-accused against whom there was allegation of recording, has not been made an accused in this case. It is also contended that the year of occurrence has also been changed by the prosecutrix. At the time when statement was recorded, she was major.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the third bail application. It is contended that prosecutrix was a child at the time when the offence was committed and in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top