SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 508

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Lalit Solanki – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shyam Paliwal, Advocate, Mukhtiyar Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his natural guardian brother Hitesh) as well as learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is of offence under Sections 397, 302, 201, 120-B IPC. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children). Act, 2015 before the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Jodhpur was rejected vide order dated 22.12.2020. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the learned Special Judge (Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005) Cases, Jodhpur and the same has been dismissed by learned Special Judge vide order dated 02.01.2021.

3. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 22.12.2020 and 02.01.2021 passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has been filed in the instant case after expiry of statutory period of 90 days. Further, there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is released on bail,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top