VIJAY BISHNOI
Rasul Kathat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.
2. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.14/2021 of Police Station Khiwada District Pali for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 363, 366, 376(2), 120B IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the prosecutrix was engaged to co-accused Suresh and the main allegation of abduction is against Suresh only. It is submitted that prosecutrix is not known to the petitioners and she has levelled allegation against the petitioners on the basis of doubt.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and after going through the case diary, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
5. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is direc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.