JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his Natural Guardian Sh. Rajjak Khan) as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for respondent No.2.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is for offences under Sections 307, 325, 323, 341, 34 of IPC. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 102 of the Act of 2015 before Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Churu was rejected vide order dated 14.12.2020. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the learned Child Court (Session Judge), Churu and the same has been dismissed by learned Appellate Court vide impugned order dated 17.12.2020.

3. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 14.12.2020 and 17.12.2020 passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is released on bail, then his release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal, or expose them to moral, physical or psychological danger, or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. It