SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 548

VIJAY BISHNOI
Gopal @ Gorap Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Anand Purohit, Advocate, B. Ray Bishnoi, Advocate, S.S. Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.100/2019 of Police Station Kherapa, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 25 and 8/29 of NDPS Act and under Section 3 of PDPP Act and under Sections 307, 332, 353, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Anand Purohit, Sr. Advocate has submitted that from the statements of the Seizure Officer PW-1, it is clear that from the car, which was allegedly driven by the petitioner, 48 kgs. of poppy straw were recovered, whereas this Court while taking into consideration the fact that 49 kgs. of poppy straw were recovered from co-accused Ghevar Ram, has enlarged on bail on the ground that narcotic contraband recovered from him is below commercial quantity.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top