SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 578

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Monika @ Mona – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sanjay Raj Pandit, Advocate, Kan Singh Oad, Advocate, S.K. Bhati, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present second bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.152/2020, P.S. Chopasani Housing Board, District Jodhpur, for the offences under Sections 386/34, 323/149, 341/34, 342/149, 386/149 IPC and Section 04 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. After the rejection of the first bail applications on 2.11.2020 & 4.9.2020, the charge-sheet has been filed. He submits that co-accused Pooja and Harji Ram have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 14.01.2021 and the case of the present petitioners is not distinguishable from that of the co-accused who have been enlarged on bail. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application, however, he is unable to distinguish the case of the present petitioners from that of the co-accused who have been enlargedon bail.

5. Having regard to the facts and circu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top