VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Monika @ Mona – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present second bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.152/2020, P.S. Chopasani Housing Board, District Jodhpur, for the offences under Sections 386/34, 323/149, 341/34, 342/149, 386/149 IPC and Section 04 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. After the rejection of the first bail applications on 2.11.2020 & 4.9.2020, the charge-sheet has been filed. He submits that co-accused Pooja and Harji Ram have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 14.01.2021 and the case of the present petitioners is not distinguishable from that of the co-accused who have been enlarged on bail. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application, however, he is unable to distinguish the case of the present petitioners from that of the co-accused who have been enlargedon bail.
5. Having regard to the facts and circu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.