SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 278

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Ram Sarup – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Tirupati Chandra, Advocate, Farzand Ali, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

2. The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of the F.I.R. No.022/2021 lodged at Mahila Police Station, District Sriganganagar.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in question is arising out of the matrimonial dispute and the list of petitioners do not include the husband of the complainant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners thus, submits that the petitioners want to submit a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority to redress the issue.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioners submit a representation along with all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation.

6. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top