SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 274

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Lakshmi Narayan Songara – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Baltej Singh Sandhu, for the Appellant; Mr. Sumer Singh Rajpurohit, PP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

2. The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C., for the following reliefs:-

    "It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed and it may kindly be ordered to execute the sentences concurrently in pursuance of impugned judgments dated 05.02.2016, 04.04.2016, 13.07.2016 and 29.05.2019 passed by learned ACJM/JM Court, Suratgarh in Criminal Case No.635/2012, 929/2012, 427/2012 and 767/2012 respectively and same was upheld by ADJ Court, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar vide its orders dated 15.01.2020."

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No.2883/2014 Rajender Kabra Vs. State of Rajasthan decided on 17.02.2017. The relevant portion of the judgment in Rajender Kabra (supra) reads as under:-

    "This second criminal misc. petition under section 482 CrPC has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner with a prayer that the sentences awarded to him in 32 different cases fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top