PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Siremal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.
2. The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking quashing of the FIR no.504/2020 lodged at P.S. Balotara, District Barmer.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mere role of the present petitioner is that he was an attesting witness to the alleged sale, which has created dispute in question.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner thus, submits that the petitioner wants to submit a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority to redress the issue.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioner submits a representation along with all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation.
6. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.