SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 301

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Satish Kumar Sharma, J.
Mahendra Singh Tanwar - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 7289/2019
Decided on : 19-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. S.S. Hora, Mr. Dharmendra Gurjar, for the Appellant; Mr. Ashwini Sharma, Spl. PP, for the Respondent.

The central legal point established is the interpretation of statutory provisions under the Criminal Procedure Code to determine liability.

Headnote:

LEGAL PROVISION : Interpretation of Statutory Provisions - Criminal Procedure Code - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The defendants were charged under the Criminal Procedure Code for an offense.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and concluded that the defendants' actions constituted an offense.

Issues: Interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Code provisions, determination of the defendants' actions as an offense.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the specific language and intent of the Criminal Procedure Code provisions to determine the defendants' liability.

Final Decision: The court found the defendants guilty and issued a judgment against them.

JUDGMENT

1- (2015) 9 SCC 588 V.K. Mishra & Anr. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.

2- AIR 1959 SC 1012 Tahsildar Singh & Anr. Vs. State of U.P.

3- 1004 SCC Online Chh 8: 2004 Cg LT 14 Ashwani Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

4- 2005 SCC Online Raj. 545 : (2006) 1 DMC 756 Narendra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Raj.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top