SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 295

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Pappu Kathat – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Awar Dan Ujjwal, Advocate, Mukhtiyar Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

2. This Court perused the material available on record.

3. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 211/2020 of Police Station Sendara, District Pali for the offences punishable under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the chargesheet in this case has already been filed.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed and conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

7. Accordingly, this second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Pappu Kathat S/o Harji shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 211/2020 of Police Station Sendara,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top