PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Pappu Kathat – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.
2. This Court perused the material available on record.
3. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 211/2020 of Police Station Sendara, District Pali for the offences punishable under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the chargesheet in this case has already been filed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed and conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
7. Accordingly, this second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Pappu Kathat S/o Harji shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 211/2020 of Police Station Sendara,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.