SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 280

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Kripa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Laxman Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ram Sharan Sharma, for the Appellant; Mr. C.S. Jodha, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants-claimants against the award dated 17.03.2018 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahpura, District Jaipur (for brevity "learned Tribunal") whereby, allowing the claim petition in part, an award of Rs. 7,32,930/-, has been passed in favour of the appellants.

2. Assailing the findings of the learned Tribunal qua Issue No.3, learned counsel for the appellants contended that the learned Tribunal has erred in assessing the monthly income of the deceased as Rs.3510/- i.e. the minimum wages payable to unskilled labour ignoring that the deceased was skilled labour.

3. Relying on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court of India in case of Laxmidhar Nayak & Ors. Vs. Jugal Kishore Behera & Ors.r 2018 (1) ACTC (SC) 5, he contended that the minimum income of Rs. 4500/- per month should have been assessed by the learned Tribunal for arriving at just and reasonable compensation. Learned counsel referred the judgment of this Court in case of Jalaur Singh & Dilawar Singh & Anr. Vs. Barkat & Ors. decided on 26.03.2012 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 6562/2011 to contend that the learned Tribunal should have assessed the month

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top