SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 228

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Jameel Ahmad Abbasi - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 173 of 2021
Decided on : 14-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Sudhir Saruparia, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

Granting limited protection from arrest and allowing custodial interrogation after giving 15 days' notice before arrest if required, in the interest of justice and to avoid unnecessary hardship to the accused.

Headnote:

COVID-19 - Quashing of FIR - The court disposed of the petition with a direction to submit a representation to the investigating authority within fifteen days, granting protection from arrest to the petitioners and allowing custodial interrogation after giving 15 days' notice before arrest if required.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a misc. petition seeking quashing of the FIR No.199/2020 lodged at P.S. Abu Road City, District Sirohi, citing ongoing civil cases between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition with a direction to the concerned investigating authority to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioners before completing the investigation, granting protection from arrest and allowing custodial interrogation after giving 15 days' notice before arrest if required.

Issues: Quashing of FIR, Protection from Arrest, Custodial Interrogation

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the peculiar facts of the case and granted limited protection from arrest to the petitioners, allowing custodial interrogation after giving 15 days' notice before arrest if required, in the interest of justice and to avoid unnecessary hardship to the accused.

Final Decision: The petitioners were granted limited protection from arrest, with the liberty to approach the court again if needed, and the stay petition was also disposed of.

JUDGMENT

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

2. The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of the F.I.R. No.199/2020 lodged at P.S. Abu Road City, District Sirohi.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that various civil cases are going on between the parties.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners thus submits that the petitioners want to submit a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority to redress the issue.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioners submit a representation along with all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation.

6. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the petitioners submit a representation along with all the necessary documents before it within a period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor.

7. In the peculiar facts of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection from arrest to the petitioners as it will be a waste of energy and resources of the Police Department to run after the accused to complete the related investigation and without protection it would also cause unnecessary hardship to the accused, who deserves a basic opportunity of explaining their case before the Investigating Authority without fear of arrest. The Investigating Officer, however, shall have the liberty of custodial interrogation after giving 15 days' notice before arrest if required. In the interest of justice and the facts and circumstances noted by this Court, the limited protection is justified. Therefore, if during the investigation, the concerned investigating authority needs to arrest the petitioners, then the petitioners shall be given 15 days' notice before making such arrest. The petitioners shall be required to join the investigation. The petitioners shall be at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.

8. The stay petition also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top