SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 219

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Angrej @ Vipin – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Himmat Jagga, Mr. Devendra Singh Thind, for the Appellant; Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Despite service upon the respondent- complainant, nobody has appeared.

2. The instant appeals have been filed under Section 14A(2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellants, who are in custody in connection with FIR No.213/2020, Police Station Sadar, Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 307, 323, 436, 336, 147, 148, 149 of IPC, section 3/25, 4/25, 27 of Arms Act, section 3, 4 of Explosive Substance Act, section 3(1) (R)(S), 3(2) (V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 21.10.2020 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sri Ganganagar, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellants was rejected.

3. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that co-accused persons namely Sunny, Vishal, Akash, Salim @ Malkiya, Manoj @ Ganda, Allahditta, Guljar Khan @ Yaru, Badshah Khan, Roshan Kumar and Shrawan Kumar have been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 13.10.2020. The charge sheet has been filed in the case. As per the charge sheet, only one person Bhupendra has received

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top