SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 209

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Kedar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Anil Jain, Advocate, Mangal Singh Saini, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhandari, J. - Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.637/2009 was registered at Police Station Badi, Dholpur for offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 I.P.C. and Section 11 of R.D.A. Act.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is aged sixty five years. He is in custody since two years. Co-accused has been enlarged on bail. Matter is of the year 2009.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top