SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 223

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Satish Kumar Sharma, J.
Liyakat Ali - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4111/2018
Decided on : 05-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anoop Dhand, for the Appellant; Mr. Prashant Sharma, PP, for the Respondent.

Fulfillment of conditions imposed by a bail order warrants the Trial Court to accord permission to the accused petitioner to leave the country.

Headnote:

Section 482 - Criminal Procedure Code - Permission to go abroad - The court allowed the petitioner to go abroad as the conditions imposed by the bail order were fulfilled, and the Trial Court was directed to accord permission in accordance with the bail order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought permission to go abroad as per the bail order, which was not granted by the Trial Court despite fulfilling the conditions imposed by the bail order.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the conditions imposed by the bail order were fulfilled, and the concerned Station House Officer confirmed that the disputed land was not in the possession of the accused petitioner.

Issues: Permission to go abroad as per the bail order.

Ratio Decidendi: The fulfillment of conditions imposed by the bail order warranted the Trial Court to accord permission to the accused petitioner to leave the country.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the direction to the Trial Court to accord permission to the accused petitioner to leave the country in accordance with the bail order.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved of the orders dated 31.01.2018 and 09.07.2018 of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, Shekhawati, Sikar in criminal case No. 11/2017 State of Rajasthan Vs. Liyakat AN regarding permission to the petitioner to go abroad.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record.

3. None has appeared on behalf of the complainant-respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail No. 10854/2017, this Court vide order dated 23.10.2017 granted bail to the present petitioner with the condition that the petitioner would not leave the country without seeking permission from the Trial Court and petitioner could not raise any objection to handing over of the possession of the share which belongs to the complainant as the mutation on the basis of Sahamati Patra was set aside. This condition has already been complied with by the petitioner but still the Trial Court has not accorded him permission to go abroad. This fact also stands fortified by the report dated 03.01.2020 submitted by the concerned Station House Officer. Therefore, the petition deserves to be allowed.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor submits for appropriate directions.

6. On bare perusal of the record, it is revealed that the accused petitioner Liyakat AN was enlarged on bail with the above mentioned condition and the Trial Court has also disposed of the application of the petitioner with the direction that he is free to leave the country on fulfillment of the conditions imposed in the bail order. In compliance of order dated 10.12.2019 of this Court, the concerned Station House Officer, Kotwali, Fatehpur, Sikar has submitted his report dated 03.01.2020 according to which disputed land is not in possession of the accused petitioner Liyakat AN and the same is in the possession of respective khatedar (tenants). Thus, above condition imposed by this Court stands fulfilled.

7. Therefore, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, Shekhawati, Sikar to accord permission to the accused petitioner to leave the country and go abroad in terms of bail order dated 23.10.2017 passed by this Court in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail No. 10854/2017 titled as Liyakat AN Joya Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top