SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 223

SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Liyakat Ali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anoop Dhand, for the Appellant; Mr. Prashant Sharma, PP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved of the orders dated 31.01.2018 and 09.07.2018 of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, Shekhawati, Sikar in criminal case No. 11/2017 State of Rajasthan Vs. Liyakat AN regarding permission to the petitioner to go abroad.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record.

3. None has appeared on behalf of the complainant-respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail No. 10854/2017, this Court vide order dated 23.10.2017 granted bail to the present petitioner with the condition that the petitioner would not leave the country without seeking permission from the Trial Court and petitioner could not raise any objection to handing over of the possession of the share which belongs to the complainant as the mutation on the basis of Sahamati Patra was set aside. This condition has already been complied with by the petitioner but still the Trial Court has not accorded him permission to go abroad. This fact also stands fortified by the report dated 03.01.2020 submitted by the concern

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top