SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 244

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Deshraj @ Deva – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kapil Gupta, Advocate, Laxman Meena, Advocate, J.K. Moolchandani, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.226/2020 registered at Police Station Atalbandh District Bharatpur for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 354, 354(Ga) & 354(Gha) of IPC, under Section 66D of Information and Technology Act, 2008 and under Section(s) 3(1)(r) & 3(1)(s) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the prosecutrix, a major lady, has married with him out of her free will; but, later on under family pressure, false allegations have been levelled against him. He submitted that FIR is inordinately delayed inasmuch as for the incident alleged to have been taken place on 08.04.2020, the FIR has been lodged on 16.09.2020. He submitted that the appellant is in custody since 24.09.2020, charge sheet has been filed, trial of the case will take time, he has no criminal antecedents and prayed for release of the appellant on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant opposing the appeal submitted that the prosecu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top