SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 254

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Mangi Lal Banjara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.B. Sharma Ganthola, Advocate, Laxman Meena, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 0106/2020 registered at Police Station Sainthal, District Dausa for the offence under Section 379 of IPC.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. With regard to criminal antecedents, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after his arrest in the present case, he has falsely been implicated in another case of similar nature in which he has already been extended benefit of bail. He submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody, charge sheet has been filed, trial of the case will take time, offence is triable by Magistrate and prays for his release on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of allegation against him, his length of custody, filing of charge sheet and the offence being triable by Magistrate; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top