SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 254

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J.
Mangi Lal Banjara - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15597 of 2020
Decided on : 05-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
R.B. Sharma Ganthola, Advocate, Laxman Meena, Advocate

The court may grant bail based on the nature of the allegation, length of custody, filing of charge sheet, and the offence being triable by Magistrate, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - Section 379 of IPC - The court granted bail to the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. considering the nature of the allegation, length of custody, filing of charge sheet, and the offence being triable by Magistrate.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for being arrested in connection with an offence under Section 379 of IPC. The petitioner claimed to have been falsely implicated and sought release on bail due to the trial taking time and the offence being triable by Magistrate.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner considering the nature of the allegation, length of custody, filing of charge sheet, and the offence being triable by Magistrate.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under Section 379 of IPC, false implication, length of custody, and nature of the offence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court granted bail to the petitioner based on the nature of the allegation, length of custody, filing of charge sheet, and the offence being triable by Magistrate, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the accused-petitioner was directed to be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties, with a stipulation regarding future offences of similar nature.

JUDGMENT

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 0106/2020 registered at Police Station Sainthal, District Dausa for the offence under Section 379 of IPC.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. With regard to criminal antecedents, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after his arrest in the present case, he has falsely been implicated in another case of similar nature in which he has already been extended benefit of bail. He submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody, charge sheet has been filed, trial of the case will take time, offence is triable by Magistrate and prays for his release on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of allegation against him, his length of custody, filing of charge sheet and the offence being triable by Magistrate; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Mangi Lal Banjara S/o Late Shri Ranjeet Banjara shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

6. However, looking to the nature of offence and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is found involved in offence(s) of similar nature in future, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the benefit of bail extended to him by this Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top