SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 239

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Wahid Ali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sher Singh, Advocate, Laxman Meena, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.363/2020 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Section 392 of I.P.C.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. With regard to criminal antecedents, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that three other criminal cases registered against him are of remote past i.e. of the year 2009. He submitted that the petitioner is in custody for last two and half months, charge sheet has been filed, trial of the case will take time, offence is triable by Magistrate and prayed for his release on bail.

3. Opposing the bail application, learned Public Prosecutor submitted that there are three other criminal cases registered against the petitioner under Section 392 I.P.C. and hence he does not deserve indulgence of bail.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of allegation against him, his length of custody, filing of charge sheet and the offence being

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top