SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 286

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Pankaj Bhandari, J.
Laturi @ Lalsingh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12733 of 2020
Decided on : 05-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Anil Jain, Advocate, Mangal Singh Saini, Advocate

The court considered the age of the petitioner and the circumstances of the case in granting bail.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 307, 504, 336 I.P.C. - The court allowed the bail application considering the age of the petitioner and the fact that the co-accused had been granted bail. The accused-petitioner was directed to furnish a personal bond and sureties for release on bail.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 307, 504, 336 I.P.C.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the age of the petitioner and the opposition by the Public Prosecutor, and deemed it proper to allow the bail application, directing the accused-petitioner to furnish a personal bond and sureties for release on bail.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the age of the petitioner and the fact that the co-accused had been granted bail.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the accused-petitioner was directed to furnish a personal bond and sureties for release on bail.

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhandari, J. - Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.197/2019 was registered at Police Station Basedi Dholpur for offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 307, 504, 336 I.P.C.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is aged sixty five years. Co-accused has been enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top