SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 375

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Ranjeet – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Abdul Kalam Khan, Advocate, F.R. Meena, Advocate, Asgar Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment Act, 2015) (for short "the Act of 1989"). The appellant has been arrested in connection with FIR No.267/2020 registered at Police Station Taleda, District Bundi for the offence (s) under Section(s) 143, 341, 323 & 302 of IPC and under Section 3(2)(V) of the Act of 1989 and later on the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323 & 302 of IPC and under Section 3(2)(V) of the Act of 1989.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that he is not named in the FIR and the eye witness Manoj, in his statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC, did not level any specific allegation against the present petitioner. He submitted that from the material on record, it is apparent that the incident occurred at the spur of moment without any premeditation. He submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.09.2020, charge-sheet has been filed, he has no criminal antecedents, co-accused Anil Saini has been extended benefit of bail by this Court and prayed for his release on bail.

3. Learned Public Pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top