SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Inderjeet Singh, J.
Badan - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 408 of 2021
Decided on : 26-02-2021

Advocates appeared:
Rajneesh Gupta, Advocate, S.K. Mahla, Advocate, Rajesh Kumar Meena, Advocate

The court has the discretion to order the release of an appellant on bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - The court allowed the appeal and ordered the release of the appellant on bail, considering the period of custody and the facts and circumstances of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed a criminal appeal under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with an FIR for various offences under the IPC and the SC/ST(POA) Act. The appellant claimed to be falsely implicated and had been in custody for about 15 days.

Finding of the Court:

The court quashed the order passed by the trial court and allowed the appeal, ordering the release of the appellant on bail, subject to satisfaction of the trial court.

Issues: False implication, period of custody, pending civil suit between the parties regarding land dispute.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the material on record, the period of custody, and the facts and circumstances of the case in deciding to order the release of the appellant on bail.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was ordered to be admitted to regular bail, subject to satisfaction of the trial court.

JUDGMENT

Inderjeet Singh, J. - The present criminal appeal under Section 14 (A) (2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.0448/2019 registered at Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 447 of IPC and Section 3(1)(S) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST(POA) Act (In FIR) and under Sections 323, 341, 447/34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(C) (F)(G)(R)(S), 2(VA) of SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act.

2. Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that initially, the police, after investigation, submitted negative final report against the accused-petitioner, however, on the protest petition being submitted by the complainant, the learned trial Court has taken cognizance against the accused-petitioner. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars for last about 15 days. Counsel further submits that civil suit between the parties with regard to land in dispute is also pending.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant has opposed the appeal.

4. Considering the material on record and also considering the period of custody and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the present case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it would be just and expedient to order the release of the appellant on bail.

5. The order dated 12.02.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Karauli is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed. Appellant be admitted to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top