SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 361

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Narsingha Ram @ Vinod – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv, for the Appellant; Mr.Mukhtiyar Khan, PP, Mr.Nikhil Bhandari, Adv, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his natural guardian father Sohan Ram) as well as learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

2. Earlier, the criminal revision petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissed vide order dt. 21.08.2020 with liberty to file fresh revision petition after recording of the statement of the prosecutrix. Now, the prosecutrix has been examined before the trial court as PW-1.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is of offence under Section 376 IPC. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children). Act, 2015 before the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Jodhpur was rejected vide order dated 05.01.2021. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the learned Sessions Judge (Children Court), Jodhpur Metropolitan and the same has been dismissed by learned Special Judge vide order dated 07.01.2021.

4. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 05.01.2021 and 07.01.2021 passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

5. Learned counsel f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top