SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 395

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Rohitash Kumar Yadav - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 3095 of 2021
Decided on : 19-02-2021

Advocates appeared:
Vikram Singh, Advocate

Equal pay for equal work principle applied in directing the respondents to make pay fixation of the petitioners equal to similarly situated Teachers.

Headnote:

Pay Fixation - Equal Pay for Equal Work - The court directed the respondents to make pay fixation of the petitioners equal to the similarly situated Teachers and granted benefit of seniority, promotion, and other consequential benefits.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought direction to make pay fixation equal to similarly situated Teachers and to grant benefit of seniority, promotion, and other consequential benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction similar to a previous case, directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation by the petitioners within three months.

Issues: Pay fixation, seniority, promotion, and other consequential benefits.

Ratio Decidendi: Equal pay for equal work principle applied. The court directed the respondents to consider and decide the representation by the petitioners within three months.

Final Decision: The writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction similar to a previous case, directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation by the petitioners within three months.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Mehta, J. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking direction to the respondents to make pay fixation of the petitioners equal to the similarly situated Teachers having been selected in the same selection process while stepping up the pay of the petitioners equal to them and that the petitioners may be granted benefit of seniority, promotion and other consequential benefits.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in similar nature writ petition filed at Jaipur Bench being Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writs No.12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 on the submissions made by counsel the respondents have been directed to decide the representation made by the petitioners therein and, therefore, a similar direction may be granted in the present case.

3. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with similar direction as given in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra), wherein, it was directed asunder:-

    "In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order."

The stay application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top