SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 384

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Balu Ram Kumawat – Appellant
Versus
Mahabal Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Manas Khatri, Mr. N.K. Gujrar, for the Appellant; Mr. Kuldeep Vaishnav, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. At the risk and cost of learned counsel for the appellant, service of notice upon the respondent Nos.1 and 2 is dispensed with.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being heard and disposed of finally.

3. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and award 05/05/2017 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara in Motor Accident Claims Case No. 75/2014. Vide judgment dated 05/05/2017, an amount of Rs.2,02,696/- has been awarded to the present appellant on account of the injuries suffered by him in the accident which occurred on 16/09/2013.

4. Brief facts of the case are that on 16/09/2013, when the appellant was going on foot over the public road towards Chittorgarh to Ajmer, an Maruti Alto Car bearing registration No.RJ.01-C.B.-4478 which was driven rashly and negligently by its driver hit the appellant, due to which he sustained several injuries. In these circumstances, a claim petition was filed before learned Tribunal.

5. Learned Tribunal, after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence available on record and hearing learned counsel for the parties, decided the claim petition filed by the appellant.

6. Learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top