SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 343

VIJAY BISHNOI
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jitendra Ojha, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.26/2020 of Police Station Rishabhdev, Distt. Udaipur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 427, 307 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the PDPP Act. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application(s).

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this/these bail application(s) filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is directed that petitioner(s) (1) Rakesh S/o Vala, (2) Shanti Lal S/o Bhim Ji and (3) Rajesh Kumar S/o Shankar Lal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.26/2020 of Police Station Rishabhdev, Distt. Udaipur provided he/she/they execute(s) a personal bond in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top