SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 311

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Harkesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vishram Prajapati, for the Appellant; Mr. F.R. Meena, P.P, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This parole petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayer that the order dated 11.01.2021 issued pursuant to the meeting of Permanent Parole Committee dated 04.12.2020 whereby the petitioner has been denied permanent parole on the ground of non availing of three regular paroles, be quashed.

2. It has been submitted in the petition that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bandikui, Dsitrict Dausa vide its judgment dated 18.12.2015 convicted the petitioner for the offence under Sections 302/34 & 342 of IPC and sentenced to maximum life imprisonment. The petitioner filed DB Criminal Appeal No.174/2016 which was partly allowed by this Court and the sentence was reduced to 10 years.

3. It has further been submitted that the petitioner had served 8 years 6 months and 26 days of imprisonment upto 25.01.2021 out of the total sentence of 10 years. He was released on two paroles of 20 and 30 days respectively by the Parole Committee. In this way, he has served a substantive part of his sentence. He never misused the liberty of parole and on completion of the parole period, he surrendered before the concerned authority on due date. During i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top