IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Smt. Sugna Devi & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1908/2020 and S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1888/2020
Decided on : 12-02-2021
Motor Accident Claim - Compensation - 9.92.536 - The judgment and award dated 13.08.2020 - The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166 - The interest @ 7.5% p.a. - The New India Assurance Company Limited & Ors. Vs. Somwati and Ors. (2020) 9 SCC 644 - Erudhaya Priya V/s State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., AIR 2020 SC 4284 - Sri Anthony @ Anthony Swami vs. The Managing Director K.S.R.T.C. reported in 2020 ACJ 1592
Fact of the Case:
Dinesh met with a fatal accident and died, leading to a claim petition. The Insurance Company raised concerns about the delay in lodging the FIR and the interest rate awarded by the Tribunal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the delay in lodging the FIR did not absolve the insurance company from liability. It also adjusted the interest rate to 7.5% p.a. based on relevant judgments.
Issues: The issues revolved around the delay in lodging the FIR, the interest rate awarded, and the adequacy of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi: The delay in lodging the FIR did not affect the liability of the insurance company. The interest rate was adjusted based on relevant judgments. The claimants were entitled to additional compensation for parental consortium.
Final Decision: The appeal of the claimants was allowed for additional compensation, and the appeal of the Insurance Company was partly allowed with a direction to pay compensation with adjusted interest.
JUDGMENT
1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present appeals are being heard and decided by this common order as both the appeals arise out of the same accident and common judgment.
2. The present appeals have been filed against the judgment and award dated 13.08.2020 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal First, Jodhpur in Motor Accident Claim case No.235/2013 (NCB No.457/2014) whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.9,92,536/- in favour of the claimants on account of death of Dinesh in the accident which occurred on 07.05.2013.
3. Brief facts of the case are that on 07.05.2013 Dinesh while going to Hinganiya Sankhli on a motorcycle bearing registration No.RJ-19-SB-0117 to drop his mother in law met with an accident. The motorcycle was dashed by truck No.RJ-19G-8954 which was being driven rashly and negligently by its driver. In the accident, Dinesh sustained fatal injuries and died during his treatment.
4. In the circumstances, a claim petition was preferred. Learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence available on record, hearing learned counsel for the parties allowed the claim petition of the claimants vide its judgment and award dated 13.08.2020 and awarded a sum of Rs.9,92,536/- as compensation to the claimants-appellants.
5. Learned counsel for Insurance Company submits that the FIR of the accident was registered after a delay of 11 days. Learned Tribunal while recording the findings on issue No.1 did not take into consideration the fact of lodging the FIR after a delay of 11 days. Thus, it creates doubt as to whether the insured vehicle in this case was involved in the accident or not. The second submission of learned counsel for the Insurance Company is that the interest @ 9% p.a. awarded by the Tribunal is highly excessive in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sri Anthony @ Anthony Swami vs. The Managing Director K.S.R.T.C. reported in 2020 ACJ 1592.
6. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents-claimants submits that deceased Dinesh was admitted in the hospital at Ahmedabad for 6-7 days and entire family was busy in taking care of the injured Dinesh, therefore, FIR could not be lodged immediately after the accident. He further submits that the finding recorded by the Tribunal on issue No.1 is proved beyond doubt and it is established by cogent evidence that the insured vehicle in the present case was the only vehicle with which the accident had occurred and Dinesh had died. Thus, the finding arrived at by learned Tribunal does not suffer from any infirmity. The counsel further submits that in the light of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Erudhaya Priya V/s State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., AIR 2020 SC 4284, the interest @ 9% p.a. has correctly been awarded by the Tribunal.
7. Having considered the submissions made at the Bar, I find that the finding recorded by the Tribunal on issue No.1 does not suffer from any infirmity as the fact of the accident has been conclusively proved by evidence available on record. Therefore, lodging of FIR after a delay of 11 days will not absolve the insurance company from its liability to make the payment of compensation. Thus, in the opinion of this court, the finding recorded by the Tribunal on issue No.1 does not require any interference by this court and the insurance company is liable to make payment of compensation. As far as interest awarded by the Tribunal is concerned, it is noted that since the accident had occurred in the year 2013 and the award was passed on 13.08.2020, therefore, considering the submissions made and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Erudhaya Priya V/s State Express Transport Corporation Ltd. & Anthony vs. the Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C. (supra) relied upon by the counsel for the respective parties, this court feels that the amount of compensation should be paid by the Insurance Company with interest @ 7.5% p.a.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.