SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 878

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.
Bank Of India & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10412/2020 and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6875/2020
Decided on : 10-02-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anil Airi, Sr. Adv, Mr. RK Salecha, Ms. Tanisha Khulechandani, Mr. Abhishek Wadhwa, Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Sr. Adv, Mr. Ashish Sharma, Adv, for the Appellant; Mr. Hemant Kothari, Major RP Singh, AAG, for the Respondent.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of a circular issued by the State Government regarding the charging of stamp duty, and the requirement for the Authority to reconsider the demand for stamp duty on specific documents in accordance with the circular and the law.

Headnote:

Stamp Duty - Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 - Interpretation of Circular - Reconsideration of Impugned Order

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged an order requiring them to pay stamp duty on certain documents. They argued that a subsequent circular issued by the State Government provided clarification on the charging of stamp duty for specific documents.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the circular allowed for reconsideration of the demand for stamp duty on certain documents and directed the Authority to re-examine the matter in light of the circular.

Issues: Interpretation of circular on stamp duty, Exorbitant demand, Arbitrary passing of order

Ratio Decidendi: The circular issued by the State Government allowed for reconsideration of the demand for stamp duty on specific documents, and the Authority was directed to afford an opportunity to both parties and pass a fresh order in accordance with the law.

Final Decision: The impugned order and consequential orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the Collector (Stamps), Jaipur Circle-I for fresh consideration in light of the circular and relevant documents.

JUDGMENT

1. The instant petitions have been filed challenging the order dated 8th June, 2020 passed under Section 37 of the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 (for short "the Act of 1998").

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during pendency of the writ petitions, circular dated 28th December, 2020 has been issued by the Finance (Tax Department), Government of Rajasthan, whereby clarification has been issued in respect of charging stamp duty on different documents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that for the document, mentioned in Article 37(b) relating to mortgage of movable/immovable property without possession, the Government has clarified that stamp duty will be payable as per the notifications, issued from time to time.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the impugned order has been passed by the respondents asking the petitioners to pay stamp duty on Common Loan Agreement and Inter-creditor Agreement by charging stamp duty @ 5%.

5. Learned counsel submitted that in view of the subsequent developments, the Authority is required to look into the circular, issued by the State Government and accordingly, an opportunity is required to be afforded to the petitioners to satisfy the Authority that the impugned order, which has been passed, needs to be reconsidered.

6. Learned counsel further submitted that the demand, which is raised in the impugned order, is also exorbitant and the order has been passed in an arbitrary manner without considering the relevant provisions, which were applicable to the documents, which are said to be having requirement of paying stamp duty in the State of Rajasthan.

7. This Court finds that the circular dated 28th December, 2020 specifically provides that the demand, which has already been raised in respect of Simple Loan Agreement, Mortgage by deposit of title deed (Equitable Mortgage) and Simple Mortgage without possession, can be reconsidered and such issues can be re-examined.

8. Learned counsel for the respondents - Mr. Hemant Kothari, appearing on behalf of Major RP Singh, AAG, submitted that he has instructions to state before this Court that if the petitioners approach the Competent Authority again to reconsider their cases about applicability of the Act of 1998 and requirement of paying any stamp duty, the parties may be given liberty to place the relevant circulars, etc. before the Authority and the Authority is fully competent to consider the circulars, which have been issued from time to time.

9. Learned counsel for the respondents also submitted that the order, which is impugned in the writ petitions, was passed by the Authority while considering the relevant provision, however, he submits that in case, the matter is remanded back, the Authority concerned will look into the entire matter and after affording an opportunity of hearing to both the sides, appropriate order will be passed.

10. This Court finds that the circular dated 28th December, 2020 is required to be considered and the Collector (Stamps), Jaipur Circle-I is required to look into the matter again after keeping in mind the circular, issued by the State Government. The Authority will also be free to decide the applicability of requirement of paying stamp duty, as per law.

11. Accordingly, the order dated 8th June, 2020 as well as consequential orders are set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Collector (Stamps), Jaipur Circle-I. The Collector (Stamps), Jaipur Circle-I will afford opportunity to both the sides and after considering the relevant documents and hearing of the parties, fresh order may be passed in accordance with law.

12. With the aforesaid, the present writ petitions are disposed of.

13. A copy of this order be separately placed in the connected file.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top