SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 867

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Joshi, for the Appellant; Mr. Ayush Gehlot, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The above mentioned appeals as well as cross objections shall stand decided by this common order as they arise out of the common accident.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The CMA Nos. 363/2002 and 438/2002 have been preferred by the RSRTC and the cross objections bearing Nos. 24/2003 & 04/2003 respectively have been filed on behalf of respondents against the judgment of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bikaner dated 12.12.2001 passed in Claim Case Nos. 22/2000 and 29/2000 respectively.

4. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeals and cross objections are that on 17.04.1999, the Tata Sumo Jeep having registration No. RJ-07-C-3242 was being driven by its driver Roshan AN. While travelling from Jodhpur to Bikaner, the said jeep collided with Roadways bus of the appellant-RSRTC bearing registration No. RJ-10-P-1430 which was coming from the opposite direction. In the accident, the driver of the Sumo vehicle Roshan AN died and Raghunath Singh who was trave

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top