SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 904

ATUL KUMAR CHATTERJEE, RAMPHOOL GURJAR
Shri Daljeet Singh Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
Sahara Prime City Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. D.M.Mathur, Mr.Narendra Kumar Sharma counsel for the non-applicants through V.C.

JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Atul Kumar Chatterjee, Member (Judicial) - The complainant has filed the complaint against the non-applicants with the facts that he is allottee of Flat No. B-7/903 in the Sahara City Homes Scheme at village Bilwa, Tonk Road, Jaipur. The complainant has paid the entire consideration amount of Rs.23,22,891/- till August 2013. According to the complainant the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice alleged against the opponents is that despite depositing the entire consideration amount the flat has not been fully constructed and the necessary development works have not been done and as per the promise the possession of the flat has not been handed over till the filing of complaint. The complainant has sought the relief to refund the deposited amount of Rs.23,22,891/- with interest besides compensation for the physical, mental and economical loss alongwith the prosecution cost.

2. In the reply besides raising certain objections regarding lack of jurisdiction of this Commission in the para wise replythe non-applicants have admitted the facts regarding allotment of the flat to the complainant and receiving the amount there for. The reason of delay in completion of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top