JUDGMENT

1. The matter comes upon second stay application filed by the petitioners.

2. When the revision petition came up before the Court for admission, by order dated 20.12.2017, notices were ordered to be issued and it was directed as under:-

"In the meanwhile and until further orders, status quo regarding the title of the property shall be maintained by the parties."

3. It is alleged in the application that after passing of the interim order dated 20.12.2017, the respondents were maintaining status quo, however, now they have started raising construction over the suit property and, therefore, they be restrained from raising construction. Alongwith the second stay application, certain photographs evidencing raising of construction have been filed.

4. A reply to the second stay application has been filed by respondents No.7 and 8 inter alia indicating that the interim order granted by the Court on the stay application is explicit, wherein, only status quo regarding the title of the suit property was directed to be maintained and that as the existing property / house in question was in dilapidated condition, as on account of heavy rains the same collapsed, the respondents were required