SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 856

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Ishwar Lal Meena & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13031/2021
Decided on : 21-09-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Hanuman Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner

The court emphasized the need for expeditious redressal of grievances and directed the competent authority to consider the representation for verification of qualifications within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:

Delay - Appointment Verification - The court directed the petitioners to file a representation before the competent authority along with a copy of the judgment they want to rely upon for verification of their educational and professional qualifications obtained from outside Rajasthan. The competent authority was directed to consider the representation and take necessary action within 12 weeks to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioners' grievance.

Fact of the Case:

Delay in appointment due to verification of qualifications from outside Rajasthan. Petitioners requested to file a representation for verification based on a court judgment.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation for verification of their qualifications. The competent authority was directed to consider the representation and take necessary action within 12 weeks.

Issues: Delay in appointment, verification of qualifications, expeditious redressal of grievance.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expeditious redressal of the petitioners' grievance and directed the competent authority to consider the representation for verification of qualifications within a specified timeframe.

Final Decision: The court directed the petitioners to file a representation for verification of their qualifications and instructed the competent authority to take necessary action within 12 weeks.

JUDGMENT

1. While pointing out that the delay in according appointment to the petitioners was caused on account of the fact that the State took its own time to verity the educational and profession qualification, which the petitioner had obtained from out of Rajasthan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in principle petitioners' case is covered by judgment passed by this Court rendered in case of Nand Kishor Sharma & Ors v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.12109/2018).

2. Without pronouncing upon petitioners' right/entitlement, the present writ petition, as requested, is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file representation before the competent authority alongwith photostat copy of the judgment he wants to rely upon and certified copy of the order instant within a period of four week's from today.

3. In case representation is so addressed, the competent authority shall consider the same and do the needful as early as possible, preferably within a period of 12 weeks of receiving the representation.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the petitioners' representation(s) has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top