SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 973

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Dharmendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, with, Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocates, for the Appellant; Mr. Laxman Meena, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Schedule Castes/Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.43/2021 registered at Police Station Mandhan, District Bhiwadi for the offence under Section(s) 143, 323, 341 & 379 of IPC and Section 3(2)(va) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act of 1989') and later on for the offence under Section(s) 323, 341 & 34 of IPC and under Section 3(1)(w)(s)-3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.

2. Learned counsels for the appellants contended that they have falsely been implicated in this case. They submitted that the material on record does not disclose commission of offence under the provision of the Act of 1989. With regard to criminal antecedents, learned counsels for the appellants submitted that none of the offence(s) involves heinous offence. They submitted that the appellants are in custody since 25.07.2021, investigation as against them is complete and prays for their release on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the appellants, the nature of allegation against t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top