SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 962

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J.
Yogendra Singh Shekhawat - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1286/2021
Decided on : 31-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Santosh Singh Shekhawat, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Laxman Meena, PP, for the Respondent; Mr. Govind Gupta, Advocate, for the Complainant

Headnote:

Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Bail - Live-in Relationship

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was arrested for offences under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Indian Penal Code. He claimed that he was falsely implicated due to a dispute with the prosecutrix, with whom he had a live-in relationship.

Finding of the Court:

Considering the nature of the allegation, length of custody, absence of criminal antecedents, and the release of the co-accused on bail, the Court deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the appellant.

Issues: Bail application under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court granted bail to the appellant based on the nature of the allegation, length of custody, absence of criminal antecedents, and the release of the co-accused on bail.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Act of Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for brevity, "the Act of 1989"). The appellant has been arrested in connection with FIR No.376/2021 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar District Jaipur City (East) for the offence (s) under Section(s) 376-D of IPC and Sections 3(1)(b), 3(1)(i)(ii), 3(2) (V) of the Act of 1989 and later on for the offence (s) under Section(s) 376-D of IPC and Sections 3(1)(B)(i)(ii), 3(2) (V) of the Act of 1989.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the prosecutrix was residing in live-in relationship with co-accused Rahul Singh Shekhawat for a period of last two and a half years. He submitted that on account of some dispute between them, the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submitted that the appellant is in custody since 22.07.2021, investigation as against him is complete, he has no criminal antecedents, main accused Rahul Singh Shekhawat has already been extended benefit of bail by this Court, the dispute has amicably been settled between the parties and prayed for his release on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted that he has no objection if the appellant is extended benefit of bail.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsels for the respective parties, the nature of allegation against him, his length of custody, the material available on record, absence of criminal antecedents and especially release of co-accused Rahul Singh Shekhawat on bail by this Court; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail.

5. The order dated 23.07.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Cases, Jaipur Metropolitan-I is quashed and set-aside and the appeal is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-appellant Yogendra Singh Shekhawat S/o Late Shri Prakash Singh Shekhawat shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1.00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top