SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 931

SANDEEP MEHTA
Vikram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rajendra Singh Rathore, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate, J.V.S. Deora, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.160/2020 registered at the Police Station Kotra, District Udaipur for the offences under Sections 370-A, 120-B and 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act, against the order dated 26.05.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Udaipur in Criminal Misc. Case No.985/2021, whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

3. I have heard and considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel Mr. Rajendra Singh Rathore, representing the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor and Mr. J.V.S. Deora, representing the complainant, and have gone through the material available on record.

4. The prosecutrix Mst. 'G' was allegedly abducted from her father's house by one Amrit in the month of September 2020. The FIR came to be registered in the month of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top