SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 913

SANDEEP MEHTA
Suman – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rahul Rajpurohit, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - The instant interim bail application under Section 439 CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner Suman W/o Raysingh, who is in custody in connection with the F.I.R. No.23/2021 registered at the Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 302, 364 and 201 IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

3. The petitioner seeks interim bail on the ground that she as well as her husband Raysingh are lodged in the jail and in their absence, their three children have been led to destitution because there is no able-bodied person in the family, who can look after them.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record verification report received from the SHO, Police Station Hanumangarh Town, as per which, the petitioner has three children, of whom two daughters are aged 13 and 9 years and one son is aged 11 years. The elder daughter is specially abled/mentally challenged. The mother-in-law of the petitioner is aged 75 years.

5. In this background and taking a humanitarian view of the matter, this court is of the opinion that the petitioner deserves indulgence of interim bail for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top