Praveen vs State - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 629

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 629

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Praveen – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, PP, Mr. J.S. Choudhary, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Annu Choudhary, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant applicant herein stands convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 08.04.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.2, Abu Road, District Sirohi in Sessions Case No.67/2016 (06/2016):

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Section 460 IPC	10 Years’ R.I.	Rs. 10,000/-	6 Months’ R.I.
Section 302 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs. 25,000/-	1 Year’s R.I.
Section 302 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs. 25,000/-	1 Year’s R.I.
Section 380 IPC	5 Years’ R.I.	Rs. 5,000/-	2 Months’ R.I.
4/25 of the Arms Act	1 Year’s S.I.	Rs. 2,000/-	1 Month’s S.I.

2. Learned counsel Shri S.S. Gour representing the applicant appellant urges that after rejection of the previous applications for suspension of sentences filed on behalf of the appellant, the application for suspension of sentences filed on behalf of the co- accused Pankaj Kumar (276/2021) has been accepted by this Court and that the case of the applicant appellant is in no manner distinguishable. It is rather contended that the evidence of the prosecution as against the appellant is weaker as compared to that in existence against the co-accused Pankaj Kumar. On this grounds,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Raj) 629

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHAPraveen – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Praveen – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent