SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 662

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Arvind Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ajay Kumar Bajpai, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the initial stage submits that he withdraws the prayer No. (iii) and (iv) of the writ petition.

2. I have considered the submissions, the petitioner in the writ petition has prayed as under:-

    "(i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to notify Eco Sensitive Zone surrounding the outer boundary of Kaila Devi Wildlife Sanctuary;

(ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to give full assistance and support of the State Authorities to the respondent No.1 and 2 to facilitate notification of Eco Sensitive Zone surrounding the outer boundary of Kaila Devi Wildlife Sanctuary expeditiously;

(iii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.4- Mining Department to extend the lease period of petitioner equal to the period when the mining operation remain closed due to Court order. Further more, to extend the lease period by virtue of provisions of Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 upto 50 years;

(iv) by an appropriat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top