IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Inderjeet Singh, J.
Arvind Kumar Baswal - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20551/2019
Decided on : 03-08-2021
Educational Qualification - Writ Petition - The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner did not possess the educational qualification required for the post at the time of filing the application form, as per the advertisement. The court also cited a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing that candidates must possess the prescribed qualifications at the time of application submission.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer but was rejected due to not holding the required educational qualification at the time of filing the application form.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not possess the necessary educational qualification as per the advertisement and declined to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner had the required educational qualification for the post at the time of filing the application form.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principle that candidates must possess the prescribed qualifications at the time of application submission, as established in the State of Uttar Pradesh v. Vijay Kumar Mishra case (2017) 11 SCC 521.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner did not meet the educational qualification criteria and the court declined to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
(i) The impugned order dated 26.7.2019 (Annex-7) and impugned letter dated 16.09.2019 (Annex-10) may kindly be quashed and set aside.
(ii) Further the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner for giving appointment to the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer considering his qualification equivalent to B.SC (Horticulture Hons.) with all consequential benefits thereto.
(iii) Any other order or direction which may be considered just and proper in the fats and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
(iv) Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner."
2. Brief facts of the case are that in pursuance of the advertisement dated 16.10.2015, the petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer and after being successful in the written examination, the petitioner was called for interview. At a later stage the petitioner was informed by the RPSC vide letter dated 26.07.2019 that his candidature has been rejected on the ground of his not holding the educational qualification as required for the post in question on the date of filing of application form. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the RPSC on 26.07.2019, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3. The educational qualification which is required for the post in question as mentioned in the advertisement reads as under:-
(ii) Working knowledge of Hindi written in Devnagri Script and knowledge of Rajasthani Culture."
4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of filing of the application form for the post in question, the petitioner was having the required degree of B.Sc (Horticulture) issued by Tamil Nadu University, Coimbatore. Counsel further submits that when candidature of the petitioner was rejected, he approached the Tamil Nadu University, Coimbatore and the said university has issued a certificate clarifying that B.Sc (Horticulture) is a 4 years degree programme which is offered by the University and it is the degree in Horticulture Science and the petitioner has completed his course from Tamil Nadu Agriculture University during the session 2008-2012 and further clarified that from the academic year 2017-18, the same degree is issued as in the nomenclature of B.Sc (Horticulture)(Hons.). Counsel further submitted that in view of the clarification issued by the University, the petitioner is having the requisite qualification as mentioned in the advertisement and therefore, the petitioner is entitled for appointment on the subject post. Counsel further submits that B.Sc (Horticulture)(Hons.) was not in existence when the petitioner acquired the degree.
5. Counsel for the respondent submitted that the educational qualification being possessed by a candidate is to be seen on the date of filing of application form. Counsel further submits that the degree issued by the said University to the petitioner is of B.Sc. Horticulture and not of B.Sc (Horticulture)(Hon.) which is required for the said post, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for appointment on the subject post.
6. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Vijay Kumar Mishra, reported in (2017) 11 SCC 521 in Para 6 has held as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.