SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 698

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Hanumanram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.K. Dadhich, Advocate, A.R. Choudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14 (A) (2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I..R. No.92/2008, Police Station Shivpura, District Pali, registered for the offences under Sections 447 and 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(5) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 20.07.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Pali, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant stated that counsel appearing on behalf of the accused before learned tiral Court was expired and the appellant has no information in this regard, therefore, the appellant could not appear before the learned trial Court on the give date and thereafter remained absent, as a result of which the appellant has been declared absconder and his bail bonds were forfeited and standing arrest warrant has been issued against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top