SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 698

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Hanumanram - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 628 of 2021
Decided on : 02-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
S.K. Dadhich, Advocate, A.R. Choudhary, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant bail after considering the entirety of facts and circumstances, despite the appellant being declared absconder and facing standing arrest warrant.

Headnote:

Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order rejecting the bail application, granting bail to the accused-appellant.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14 (A) (2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the rejection of his bail application. The appellant was in judicial custody in connection with F.I..R. No.92/2008, facing charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Finding of the Court:

After considering the arguments and the entirety of facts and circumstances, the court found that the appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail, and consequently allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ordering the release of the accused-appellant on bail.

Issues: The main issue was the rejection of the appellant's bail application, based on the appellant being declared absconder and his bail bonds being forfeited, leading to a standing arrest warrant against him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the appellant's submissions regarding the expired counsel and the appellant's absence, as well as the opposition from the Public Prosecutor regarding the appellant being absconded since 2011. After evaluating the arguments and circumstances, the court decided to grant bail to the appellant.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ordering the release of the accused-appellant on bail, subject to certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14 (A) (2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I..R. No.92/2008, Police Station Shivpura, District Pali, registered for the offences under Sections 447 and 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(5) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 20.07.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Pali, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant stated that counsel appearing on behalf of the accused before learned tiral Court was expired and the appellant has no information in this regard, therefore, the appellant could not appear before the learned trial Court on the give date and thereafter remained absent, as a result of which the appellant has been declared absconder and his bail bonds were forfeited and standing arrest warrant has been issued against him by the learned trial Court; the appellant is behind the bars since 19.07.2021; and the trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the appellants prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the appellants.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal and stated that the accused-appellant has been absconded since 2011.

5. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the appellants deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 20.07.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Pali, is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Hanumanram S/o Sh. Madaram arrested in connection with F.I..R. No.92/2008, Police Station Shivpura, District Pali, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top